rworkflows
Test, Document, Containerise, and Deploy R Packages
Description
Reproducibility is essential to the progress of research, yet achieving it remains elusive even in computational fields. Continuous Integration (CI) platforms offer a powerful way to launch automated workflows to check and document code, but often require considerable time, effort, and technical expertise to setup. We therefore developed the rworkflows suite to make robust CI workflows easy and freely accessible to all R package developers. rworkflows consists of 1) a CRAN/Bioconductor-compatible R package template, 2) an R package to quickly implement a standardised workflow, and 3) a centrally maintained GitHub Action.
Downloads
352
Last 30 days
10895th
367
Last 90 days
461
Last year
CRAN Check Status
Show all 14 flavors
| Flavor | Status |
|---|---|
| r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang | OK |
| r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc | OK |
| r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang | OK |
| r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc | OK |
| r-devel-macos-arm64 | OK |
| r-devel-windows-x86_64 | OK |
| r-oldrel-macos-arm64 | NOTE |
| r-oldrel-macos-x86_64 | OK |
| r-oldrel-windows-x86_64 | OK |
| r-patched-linux-x86_64 | OK |
| r-release-linux-x86_64 | OK |
| r-release-macos-arm64 | OK |
| r-release-macos-x86_64 | OK |
| r-release-windows-x86_64 | OK |
Check details (2 non-OK)
Rd cross-references
Package unavailable to check Rd xrefs: ‘BiocPkgTools’
package dependencies
Package suggested but not available for checking: ‘BiocPkgTools’
Check History
NOTE 10 OK · 1 NOTE · 0 WARNING · 0 ERROR · 0 FAILURE Mar 27, 2026
package dependencies
Package suggested but not available for checking: ‘BiocPkgTools’
ERROR 4 OK · 1 NOTE · 0 WARNING · 1 ERROR · 0 FAILURE Mar 23, 2026
package dependencies
Package suggested but not available for checking: ‘BiocPkgTools’
tests
Running ‘testthat.R’ [17s/30s] Running the tests in ‘tests/testthat.R’ failed. Complete output: > # This file is part of the standard setup for testthat. > # It is recommended that you do not modify it. > # > # Where should you do additional ...[truncated]... hors.R:5:3'): construct_authors works ─────────── Expected `as.character(a1) %in% ...` to be TRUE. Differences: `actual`: FALSE `expected`: TRUE [ FAIL 1 | WARN 0 | SKIP 11 | PASS 66 ] Error: ! Test failures. Execution halted